The Vaccine Mandate Is Unconstitutional
Read the complete document for yourself. You cannot and should not be rely on headlines, pundits, or opinions. Read it yourself and don’t let the buffoons on social media, TV, and radio sell you their lies!
It is important to read all parts of the court document. Especially interesting is the insight into the minds of the clearly unconstitutional opinions of the dissenters. If you want to know how deranged and dangerous their thinking is, read what they say and keep it in mind as you discern more about how intellectually and morally bankrupt those dissenters are.
Some tips for your reading:
Per curiam decision – Pages 1-9
Per curiam decision is a ruling issued by an appellate court of multiple judges in which the decision rendered is made by the court acting collectively.
“The applications for stays presented to JUSTICE KAVANAUGH and by him referred to the Court are granted.”
A stay of proceedings is a ruling by the court in civil and criminal procedure, halting further legal process in a trial or other legal proceeding.
Concurring – Pages 10-16 (7 pages)
In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different reasons as the basis for their decision.
Dissenting – Pages 17-30 (14 pages)
Dissent is an opinion, philosophy or sentiment of non-agreement or opposition to a prevailing idea or policy enforced under the authority of a government, political party or other entity or individual.