A Call to Minnesotans: Recognizing the Broken Mindset and Charting a New Course for Our State
By Phillip C. Parrish, Candidate for Governor of Minnesota 2026
Fellow Minnesotans,
As a retired Navy Lieutenant Commander with 21 years of service in counterterrorism and foreign policy, an educator, farmer, and lifelong resident of this great state, I’ve dedicated my life to protecting what we hold dear. Now, as I run for Governor in 2026, I’m committed to servant leadership that ends fraud, restores integrity, and unites us all. I’ve spoken with thousands of you across Minnesota—from the farms of the southwest to the lakes of the north—and what strikes me is how many of us intuitively understand what’s gone wrong. We sense the patterns of division and decline, even if we haven’t always put words to them. Today, I urge every Minnesotan, regardless of party or background, to recognize these facts, confront the harmful ideologies that have taken root, and join me in having the courage to walk away from a broken mindset. Together, we can correct course and build a Minnesota that uplifts everyone through merit, honesty, and true community.
The Timeline: How It All Began in the Mid-1980s
Let’s start with the facts and the timeline, because understanding our history is the first step to reclaiming our future. In the early 1980s, Minnesota enacted Chapter 43A of our state statutes, including Section 43A.191, which mandated affirmative action programs for state agencies. This law required executive branch entities to develop plans addressing underrepresentation of protected groups, such as women, minorities, and people with disabilities, with full-time affirmative action officers and progress reports. What began as an effort to promote equity—rooted in federal civil rights advancements from the 1960s—evolved into something more rigid and divisive over the decades.
Around the same time, in the mid-to-late 1980s, cultural shifts amplified this policy framework. The stereotype of “Minnesota Nice” gained widespread popularity, thanks to figures like humorist Howard Mohr’s 1987 book How to Talk Minnesotan and Garrison Keillor’s A Prairie Home Companion radio show, which peaked in influence during that era. Rooted in our Scandinavian immigrant heritage from the 19th and early 20th centuries, this “nice” demeanor emphasized politeness, conflict avoidance, and conformity—traits that trace back to cultural norms like the “Law of Jante,” which discourages standing out or challenging the group.
Simultaneously, the rise of “political correctness” (PC) took hold nationally and in Minnesota’s academic and media circles. In the 1980s, PC emerged as a way to curtail offensive speech and promote sensitivity, often in higher education settings like the University of Minnesota, where diversity curricula began to expand. While it started with good intentions—protecting underrepresented voices—it shifted toward enforcing ideological conformity, stifling debate on campuses and beyond. In Minnesota, this intersected with our politics, where bipartisan support for affirmative action under governors like Rudy Perpich (1983–1991) embedded these ideas into state institutions.
By the early 1990s, these elements converged with waves of immigration, including Somali refugees drawn by our welfare system and job opportunities. Policies like 43A.191 facilitated integration efforts, but without addressing underlying tensions, they sowed seeds of resentment.
Recognizing the Pattern: Conformity, Preferences, and Division
The pattern is clear when we connect these dots: A mid-1980s pivot toward institutionalized group preferences (via laws like 43A.191), combined with cultural norms of “Minnesota Nice” and PC, created a system that prioritizes appearance over substance, suppression over dialogue, and division over unity. It’s a bipartisan issue—both parties have allowed this mindset to persist for over 40 years, often for political gain, like building voter bases or accessing federal funds.
Under this framework, state agencies must justify hires from “non-underrepresented” groups (e.g., white, able-bodied, straight males) in certain roles, turning merit-based employment into a bureaucratic hurdle. Meanwhile, “Minnesota Nice” masks real concerns with passive politeness, discouraging honest conversations about policy failures. PC reinforces this by labeling dissent as insensitive, creating echo chambers in media, academia, and government.
This isn’t just theory—it’s a repeating cycle that has eroded trust and fueled unrest, from muted debates in the 1990s to the fractures exposed in 2020.
Why This Mindset Is Proven Wrong and Harmful
The evidence is undeniable: This mindset is wrong because it contradicts our core American values of equal opportunity and free speech, and it’s harmful because it demonstrably divides us. Look no further than the U.S. Department of Justice’s investigation, launched on July 10, 2025, into the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) for potential race- and sex-based discrimination in hiring. The DOJ is probing whether policies requiring “hiring justifications” for non-underrepresented candidates violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, creating reverse discrimination and inefficiency. This isn’t equity—it’s a system that pits groups against each other, wasting taxpayer dollars on bureaucracy while qualified Minnesotans are sidelined.
Culturally, “Minnesota Nice” and PC have proven harmful by fostering passive-aggression and silencing voices, leading to unaddressed issues like economic disparities and social isolation. Studies and critiques show how these norms exacerbate exclusion, particularly for newcomers, contributing to the tensions that boiled over in 2020. Nationally, the 1980s rise of PC has been linked to increased polarization, as it curtails free expression and breeds resentment. In Minnesota, this has hollowed out our institutions, turning what should be collaborative spaces into echo chambers of empty ideologies that prioritize virtue-signaling over real progress.
The harm is real: Lowered morale in state agencies, stifled innovation in education, and a fractured sense of community that leaves all Minnesotans—regardless of background—feeling unheard and undervalued.
The Courage to Walk Away and Join the Fight
Minnesotans, it’s time to have the courage to walk away from this broken mindset. We don’t need to demonize anyone—we need to confront behaviors and ideologies that no longer serve us. As your Governor, I’ll lead reforms: Amending 43A.191 to focus on merit with transparent audits, promoting free speech policies in schools and workplaces, and holding agencies accountable for results, not rhetoric.
Join me in this grassroots movement. Visit parrish4mn.com to get involved, attend a town hall, or share your story on Freedom Talk with Phil. Together, we’ll build a Minnesota where hard work is rewarded, voices are heard, and our “nice” is genuine—not a mask for division.
For Minnesota’s future,
Phillip C. Parrish
Candidate for Governor, 2026
###